Monday, June 8, 2009

Photogenicity - in the Wiktionary if not the Dictionary

I am a firm believer in the theory of photogenicity. I know that I have never looked my best in photos (other people have confirmed this for me.) My theory has always been that my features are not quite defined enough and so the camera simply records a fleshy blob instead of my face. Perhaps it is speciesist of me, but I never thought that animals would have this same problem. I have found, however, that in the three years since I have lived with cats, that some of them have their likenesses taken much easier than do others.

Tiberius for example, looks lovely in almost every photo even with a modest camera, mediocre lighting, and no retouching (as you can see). His typical tabby pattern and color and matte coat absorb the light perfectly making him look even better in the photo than he does in reality.

Buggie however, though her fluffy gray fur comes out well, has facial features that come out strangely in photos. This baffles me because she is probably (and this viewpoint is completely and utterly unbiased) the prettiest cat ever.

Now Dickens, who is also almost unbearably handsome, looks like a shiny black smudge in photographs. He is too black and too sleek and the light just bounces off of him.

Last night I was determined to take photographs of my pets that capture their beauty so I used a clip-on flash (Nikon Speedlight SB-600) to bounce the flash off of the walls, ceilings, bookcases, and anything else I could point the light at, to try create the right conditions to capture the perfect shot.




Two shots of Buggie. I didn't have enough light in the first picture, but at least she looks like herself.

The second shot is a profile view in which the viewer can appreciate her fluffiness and adorableness.








I only achieved success on one shot of Dickens, but even one is miraculous. He still isn't as handsome in the picture as he is in real life, but at least he is not a shiny black blob.


I'll have to practice more with the clip-on flash. I still have no idea what I'm doing. But I'm looking forward to more picture of my cats pretending to be photogenic!

2 comments:

  1. When using a hotshoe flash (if that's what you mean by "clip on") use the bounce mode on it and blast that light off other surfaces to get a broader and more gradual & softer distribution of light. It seems you may have done this but i am not sure. also when shooting directly with the flash i would recommend using a Diffuser seeing how shooting directly tends to create blown out highlights and over exposure at close distances. You can either Go D.I.Y in various manners( I use notecards attached to ductape to act as a reflective bounce card diffuser) or go to a camera shop and pick them up, but i mean your'e paying more money for an item that probably cost in the cents range to make. sorry if none of this helps maybe it is info you allready know, but i just felt like typing something out.

    Here I award you two Interwebs

    http://www.diyphotography.net/

    http://www.instructables.com/group/diyphotographydotnet/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks! We got the flash for Xmas and I haven't learned how to use it yet. But while I was watching TV the other night I saw the camera and flash on the coffee table, turned around and saw the cats on the back of the couch and started shooting! But I'm motivated now to learn what I'm doing.

    ReplyDelete